Witness intake
Were you conned by the Tate enterprise? Share your story.
If you paid money to The Real World, Hustlers University, the War Room, the fundraiser.com hackathon or lending arm, or any other Tate-enterprise product and did not receive what you were promised, your first-hand account matters. Send it directly, or use the intake form below.
Direct email
Write to Anthony Mitchell directly. Attach receipts, screenshots, Stripe statements, chat logs, refund denials — anything that backs up what you remember.
Why this matters
Mitchell v. Tate et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-00720-JAD-BNW, is a federal civil RICO action pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The First Amended Complaint asks the Court for, among other relief, injunctive relief and corrective-notice orders requiring the takedown of fundraiser.com/hackathon, restrictions on the operation of the related Tate-enterprise platforms, and equitable measures targeting the brand and payment infrastructure used to run the alleged scheme.
Injunctive and equitable relief of that scope is rarely granted on the strength of a single plaintiff’s declaration alone. It is granted when courts see a pattern — a series of corroborating, first-hand accounts from independent former participants who say, in substance, the same thing: that they paid, that they were promised something, and that they did not get what they were promised. A handful of sworn declarations from other former Tate-platform participants is the kind of evidence that materially strengthens the existing requests for that relief.
If you are one of those former participants, your account — even a short one — could be the corroboration the record needs.
What is most useful
- Receipts and statements. Stripe receipts, credit-card statements, PayPal transactions, crypto-wallet outflows — anything that shows the money moved.
- Promises in writing. Screenshots of landing pages, sales pages, chat-agent transcripts, email pitches, Telegram conversations, recorded video calls.
- Refund denials. If you tried to get your money back and were told no, the denial itself is evidence.
- Dates and dollar amounts. Even rough ones. Specific dates and amounts are dramatically more persuasive than general impressions.
- Names you interacted with. Telegram handles, Discord names, X accounts, first names of “professors” or “captains.”
How your submission will be used
Your account may be used to support court filings in the Litigation, including declarations, exhibits, and briefing on the takedown and corrective-notice requests described above. If your submission is used in a public filing, the Publisher will, on request and to the extent permitted by the Court’s local rules, redact or anonymize personally identifying details (full name, home address, employer) and limit the use of your information to what is necessary to make the point you are corroborating. The Publisher will not sell, trade, or commercialize your information.
The Publisher is the plaintiff in the Litigation and is appearing pro se. The Publisher is not an attorney. Submitting your story does not create an attorney-client relationship, is not legal advice, and does not entitle you to any share of any recovery in the Litigation. See the Privacy Policy & Terms of Use for the full statement of the Publisher’s editorial process, source protection (Section 9), and corrections procedure (Section 13).
Intake form
Filling this in builds a pre-formatted email that opens in your default mail application. Review it, attach any documentation, and send. Nothing is transmitted until you press send in your own email client.